Inquiring minds are looking at the NYTimes article about the problem of defaulting on second homesas it pertains to the laws in the different states:
…a study by researchers from the European University Institute, Northwestern University and the University of Chicago concluded that the strategic default trend was “large and rising” among homeowners with an equity shortfall of $100,000. As of last March, it said, strategic defaults accounted for 35.6 percent of all foreclosures, compared with 23.6 percent a year earlier.
“I’m increasingly seeing people who are middle class or higher on the pay scale coming to the conclusion that ‘I may be able to carry it, but should I?,’ ” said David Shaev, a bankruptcy lawyer in New York who assists homeowners in distress.
The important question is, can the bank come after you?
In “recourse” states, a lender can come after you, and usually other assets like a primary residence, for the full mortgage amount. In “nonrecourse” states, a lender agrees to accept whatever the property fetches at a short sale, foreclosure sale, or a deed-in-lieu, in which the property is taken back but not formally foreclosed on, and generally can’t sue for the full loan amount. Florida, Connecticut and Arizona are among the nonrecourse states, while Colorado, Maine, New Jersey and Hawaii are recourse states.
There is a third category of state, called “single-action” or “one-action,” which allows the lender either to foreclose on the owner or file a civil lawsuit for the full loan amount. New York, California and Idaho are in that category.
Even in a nonrecourse state, however, those homeowners who opt for a strategic default on a previously refinanced property may not be protected from lenders, because the mortgage in such a case was not accorded for a first purchase, said Philip Faranda, a mortgage broker for J. Philip Real Estate, in Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.
The actual article has interesting info on filing bankruptcy which many will find illuminating.
Filed under: Uncategorized |